Manja slova Veća slova RSS
Top news Most read  
27.09.2018

Decision in favour of Montenegro before ECHR in Strasbourg in Romagnoli v. Montenegro case

The European Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg ruled in the Romagnoli v. Montenegro case and decided to reject the application as inadmissible for the abuse of the right to petition under Article 35 § 3 and 4 of the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms...



22.10.2019.

ECHR rules against Montenegro

ECHR rules against Montenegro

In the case of KIPS DOO and Drekalović v. Montenegro (No. 28766/06), the European Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg has delivered a judgment on just satisfaction, which obliges the State of Montenegro to pay to KIPS DOO (“The first applicant”) a total of EUR 4,535,595.20 for a violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms...





KEI

Ask the Government

• Ask the Government

Current News

22.10.2019.

ECHR rules against Montenegro

In the case of KIPS DOO and Drekalović v. Montenegro (No. 28766/06), the European Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg has delivered a judgment on just satisfaction, which obliges the State of Montenegro to pay to KIPS DOO (“The first applicant”) a total of EUR 4,535,595.20 for a violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms...

more...
19.03.2019.

European Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg rules against Montenegro

In the case of Bigović v. Montenegro (No. 48343/16), the European Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg has declared the application partly ill-founded under Article 35 (3) (a) and paragraph 4 of the European Convention on Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms. In parallel, the European Court has found a violation of Article 3 of the Convention and Article 5 paragraph 1 and paragraph 3 of the Convention...

more...
05.03.2019.

ECHR rules against Montenegro

In the case of Šaranović v. Montenegro, the European Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg has declared the application partly ill-founded under Article 35 paragraph 3 (a) and paragraph 4 of the European Convention on Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, and partly premature under Article 35 paragraph 1 and paragraph 4 of the Convention. At the same time, the European Court has found a violation of the right to liberty and security under Article 5 § 1 (c) of the Convention...

more...
27.09.2018.

Decision in favour of Montenegro before European Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg in Romagnoli v. Montenegro case

The European Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg ruled in the Romagnoli v. Montenegro case and decided to reject the application as inadmissible for the abuse of the right to petition under Article 35 § 3 and 4 of the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms...

more...
17.07.2018.

Verdict in favor of Montenegro before European Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg

The European Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg issued a verdict in the Petrović and Others v. Montenegro case, which, in the part of the alleged violation of Article 1 of Portfolio 1 of the Convention, unanimously dismissed the application as inadmissible, and in part found that there had been no violation of Article 6 of the Convention (four for three). This verdict of the European Court is of particular importance because in the particular case, the European Court did not reject the application under the procedural conditions of inadmissibility in the part of the examination of the violation of Article 6 of the Convention but already entered the merits of the case and found that our state did not violate the applicants' right...

more...